<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Bible and Sex....a non-theist review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nosha.info/the-bible-and-sex-a-non-theist-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nosha.info/the-bible-and-sex-a-non-theist-review/</link>
	<description>New Orleans Secular Humanist Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Seth Dunn		</title>
		<link>https://nosha.info/the-bible-and-sex-a-non-theist-review/#comment-34</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Dunn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nosha.info/the-bible-and-sex-a-non-theist-review/#comment-34</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;The Bible is supposed at least to be divinely inspired, and for more fundamentalist believers to be a perfect revelation of divine will, yet interpretations of that inspired or revealed word vary tremendously. Moreover, that variation in interpretation is not just something we find among ordinary churchgoers; it is endemic to the high-powered biblical scholars who influence, and maybe even guide, rank-and-file opinion.&#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You seem to be making the point that Christians can&#039;t agree with each other over their own Holy Book even though it is supposedly revealed or inspired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stephen D. Moore, for example, is an atheist.  He doesn&#039;t beleive the Bible is inspired at all; he doesn&#039;t beleive in God.  You are framing the 2013 Greer-Heard forum as an intra-church argument.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is it really?  The speakers don&#039;t hold to the same standard of biblical inspiration, to say the least.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The Bible is supposed at least to be divinely inspired, and for more fundamentalist believers to be a perfect revelation of divine will, yet interpretations of that inspired or revealed word vary tremendously. Moreover, that variation in interpretation is not just something we find among ordinary churchgoers; it is endemic to the high-powered biblical scholars who influence, and maybe even guide, rank-and-file opinion.&quot;</p>
<p>You seem to be making the point that Christians can&#39;t agree with each other over their own Holy Book even though it is supposedly revealed or inspired.</p>
<p>Stephen D. Moore, for example, is an atheist.  He doesn&#39;t beleive the Bible is inspired at all; he doesn&#39;t beleive in God.  You are framing the 2013 Greer-Heard forum as an intra-church argument.</p>
<p>Is it really?  The speakers don&#39;t hold to the same standard of biblical inspiration, to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
